FCC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking entitled “Restoring Internet Freedom", WC Docket No.17-108.
Find NAR's letters, testimonies, bill updates, and more on the NAR Federal Issues Tracker
What is the fundamental issue?
Net neutrality is shorthand for the concept that Internet users should be in control of what content they view and what applications they use on the Internet. More specifically, net neutrality requires that broadband networks be free of restrictions on content, sites, or platforms. Networks should not restrict the equipment that may be attached to them, nor the modes of communication allowed on them. Finally, networks should ensure that communication is not unreasonably degraded by other communication streams.
I am a real estate professional. What does this mean for my business?
The business of real estate is increasingly conducted on-line. Streaming video, virtual tours and voice-over-internet-protocol are just some of the technologies that are commonly used by real estate professionals today. In the future, new technologies will be adopted which will no doubt require unencumbered network access.
Some real estate professionals, realty website operators and real estate industry affiliated content providers believe net neutrality provisions are necessary to prevent broadband providers (cable and telephone companies, primarily) from implementing possibly discriminatory practices that could negatively impact real estate professionals’ use of the Internet to market their listings and services. Some possible examples include practices that would (1) limit the public’s access to real estate websites, (2) limit a real estate firm access to online service providers who may be in competition with the network operators’ (ISP’s) own services, e.g. Internet phone services, or (3) charging certain websites more for the broadband speeds necessary to properly transmit or display audio or video content such as online property tour, podcast or phone services.
NAR supports legislative and regulatory efforts to ensure that broadband providers adhere to net neutral practices. NAR is concerned about the FCC's "fast lanes" proposal and has commented in opposition to that proposal in 2015.
The business of real estate is increasingly conducted on-line. Streaming video, virtual tours and voice-over-internet-protocol are just some of the technologies that are commonly used by real estate professionals today. Net neutral practices will be essential to ensure that real estate content can be freely and efficiently distributed online.
NAR supports seven principles to guide lobbying efforts on any legislation to require broadband providers to adhere to net neutral practices:
- Consumers are entitled to access the lawful Internet content of their choice;
- Consumers are entitled to run applications and services of their choice, subject to the needs of law enforcement;
- Consumers are entitled to connect their choice of legal devices that do not harm the network;
- Consumers are entitled to competition among network providers, application and service providers, and content providers;
- Network providers should not discriminate among internet data transmissions on the basis of the source of the transmission as they regulate the flow of network content;
- Broadband providers must be transparent about the service they provide and how they run their network and;
- These principles should apply to both wireless and wireline networks.
On December 21, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued new rules on net neutrality. Under these rules, wired broadband providers were "prohibited from blocking lawful content, applications, services and the connection of nonharmful devices to the network." Wireless broadband providers, however, were allowed more flexibility, reflecting the technical limitations on the amount of traffic a wireless network can handle. Both wired and wireless broadband providers would have been subject to transparency requirements, which require them to let consumers know how they manage network activity. The new rules also allowed internet service providers to charge usage-based fees for broadband, so customers using more bandwidth may be charged more for service than customers using less bandwidth.
On January 14, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that key elements of the FCC's 2010 Open Internet Order are invalid. By tossing out these rules, ISPs are now free to charge content companies higher fees to deliver Internet traffic faster or otherwise more efficiently.
On May 15, 2014, the FCC issued a new proposed rule for comment. This rule would allow large content providers like Netflix and Facebook and others to negotiate separate, exclusive deals with Internet Service Providers to carry their content on faster connections. This has been termed "Internet fast lanes."
NAR filed comments opposing the Commission's "fast lanes" proposal. In addition the Association organized a broad real estate coalition including over 100 MLSs, large firms and industry associations opposing the FCC's proposal.
The FCC published its Open Internet order in March 2015. The Order seeks to prevent Internet Service Providers from blocking Web traffic, slowing it down or setting up paid fast lanes.
Several ISPs and their industry associations have filed lawsuits challenging the FTC's authority to implement this order. It is likely to take several years for these lawsuits to wind their way through the courts. On June 14, 2016, the D.C. Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the FCC's net neutrality regulations to ensure an open internet in the U.S. In the ruling, internet providers aren't allowed to block, slow, or sell faster delivery of legal content on their networks. ISPs appealed this decision to the Supreme Court.
On April 27, 2017 the FCC issued a proposal to rollback the 2015 Open Internet Order. This proposal would:
- Eliminate Title II regulation of Internet Service Providers thereby eliminating FCC authority to regulate ISPs
- Shift regulatory authority for privacy and anticompetitive concerns to the Federal Trade Commission
- Eliminate the Internet Conduct Standard, a broad rule giving the FCC the authority to act if a broadband provider acts in a manner that is anticompetitive or harmful to consumers.
- Seeking public comment on "Bright Line Rules" or rules that prohibit the control of the flow of web traffic like blocking, degrading or creating fast lanes should be eliminated or modified.
The NPRM will likely be approved at the next FCC open meeting scheduled for May 18. The public will then have 60 days to provide comments.
NAR will continue to work the Congress and the FCC to protect members ability to freely share lawful content on the internet.
Federal Technology Policy Advisory Board