Case summaries are provided for educational purposes only, and are not a substitute for legal advice by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. Case law may change over time, so be sure to confirm a case is still good law.
California court holds that broker had no duty to discover or disclose to homebuyer that local regulatory requirements could preclude building home on purchased lot.
District of Columbia federal court determines that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development did not have the authority from the Fair Housing Act to create its disparate impact rule and so vacated the rule.
Federal appellate court reverses lower court, determining that lower court did not properly evaluate a REALTOR® association's arbitration process.
New Jersey federal court rules that the patent is directed at an abstract idea and thus may not be eligible for patent protection.
Federal appellate court affirms trial court’s determination that the sellers in this class-action lawsuit had failed to produce any evidence demonstrating the existence of a conspiracy to fix commission rates by brokerage firms.
New York court holds listing broker liable for seller’s incorrect assertion that home was connected to city sewer system.
Administrative law panels determine that registrants registered domains containing the term “REALTOR®” in bad faith.
Georgia court allows buyer’s lawsuit against the seller to proceed after she made improvements to the wrong property based on photos in the listing.
New York Court enforces team commission split agreement and awards plaintiff team member full commission amounts owed pursuant to its terms.
Maine court rules broker could retain half of the forfeited buyers' deposit, even when the broker received a subsequent commission from a sale.